Cheating today!

Okay gang..... I'm cheating today. It was time to post again when I happened upon something by a Mr. Gary DeMar (and a commenter of his) that pretty much sum up my personal take on a matter of consequence to the entire planet. No.... I'm not talking about the leftist hoax of "global warming" or "Climate Change" either. I've already shot those bogus claims so full of holes they can no longer float on any pond my readers know of. Nope..... today's topic is that of Islam and its true nature. Mr. DeMar and one person who posted supporting comments do a stellar job of shining the light of truth on this, so called, "religion of peace" we keep hearing Obama speak so glowingly about. Here is Mr. DeMar's posting:

************************************************************************

The Bible says that a tree is known by its fruit:

“Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits” (Matt. 7:15-20).

How many times have we heard Islamic apologists tell us, “You can’t condemn an entire religion because of the actions of a few”? True enough until you ask this question: “Where is your outward and vocal condemnation of the actions of the few?” Islamic atrocities are in the news daily. There are pictures of mass killings, and yet the Islamic community has remained virtually silent.

Bill Muehlenberg at Culture Watch gets to the heart of the issue:

“So did you hear about the mass demonstration of Muslims in Sydney worried about Islamic extremism? Did you catch the big turnout of Muslims in Paris denouncing jihad? Did you notice the tens of thousands of Muslims marching in London to stand against Islamic bloodshed and violence in Iraq? Did you read about the anti-jihad protests by concerned Muslims in Amsterdam?

"Neither did I. “Instead, all we hear is crickets chirping. The silence has been deafening. One atrocity after another takes place all over the world, and the Islamic community remains absolutely mute. We just don’t hear a peep out of them distancing themselves from the terror and murder."

“And there may be several reasons for this. One, moderate Muslims really may not exist. Perhaps that is the reason. Or two, if they do exist, they rightly know that if they do speak up, they could well lose their heads – literally. That is also telling: Islam is so bad, that those who prefer real tolerance, civilization and basic humanity are too terrified to speak up."

“And heaven knows there is plenty to speak up about. Not a day goes by without yet another horrific atrocity and murderous rampage being committed in the name of Islam. It becomes nearly impossible to keep up with them all.” The list of atrocities continues to add up. When we see images of the holocaust, we ask why the German people didn’t rise up in protest against the monster Adolf Hitler."

There’s no way to ignore the fact that Islam is a detestable religion. If there are moderate Muslims who take offense at that evaluation, then I suggest that you take to the streets by the millions and prove me wrong.

“While it is true that most Muslims are not suicide bombers, or engage in decapitating the kafir and posting their pics on YouTube, Islam itself is a political ideology that is fundamentally about bloodshed, killing, terror and jihad. While there may be ‘nice’ Muslims, Islam is not nice.

“And the fact that ‘moderate’ Muslims remain silent about all the hideous bloodshed, torture and murder being done in the name of their religion, their god, and their prophet, is most telling indeed.”

Freed Islamic terrorist Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who now leads the Sunni ultra-extremist group Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), said, "I'll see you in New York," threatening to bring jihad to America. I want to know on whose side the so-called moderate Muslims will fight? Will they join with the jihadists or us? At this point, I don't know.

****************************************************************************

After this piece there was a comment section. Most of the comments are fairly on topic but there are always "trolls" who are nothing more than brainless leftist tools who like to post pointless and usually hateful remarks at these sites. One such troll challenged another poster to back up his assertion that Islam was based on hate, bigotry and intolerance...... which the troll claimed was a lie. Here is the lengthy reply to the troll:

****************************************************************************

As long as they worship the Quo'ran they cannot be peaceful. The Quo'ran says:

Qur'an 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.”

Qur'an 9:123 “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.”

Qur'an - 5:51 "O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other."

Qur'an 9:5 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.”

Qur'an 3:85 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.”

Qur'an 9:30 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”

Qur'an 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”

Qur'an 9:28 “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.”

Qur'an 9:29 "Fight Those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth,
from among the People of the Book, until they pay Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  (kindly notice that "People of the Book" are mentioned. "The Book" being either the Torah or the Bible or both. Also notice that the Qur'an itself refers to followers of those Books as "The Religion of TRUTH!" which leads to the obvious conclusion that their "religion" must be a lie then or at least based upon a foundation of lies.)

Qur'an 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.”

Qur'an 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.”

Qur'an 3:28 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.”

Qur'an 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.”

Qur'an 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.”

Qur'an 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.”

Qur'an 48:29 “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves.”

Sahih Muslim 33 - "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah."

Sahih Muslim 4366 - "I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims."

Sooner or later all Muslims will be called upon to "do their duty" and most will comply. This is what makes them so dangerous. They worship hate while claiming to be peaceful. You cannot be both a good Muslim and be peaceful

***********************************************************************

Kindly bear in mind all the stuff above ONLY deals with how Islam views all other religions and people of either other faiths or no faith. It does not address how Islam views women at all. There are estimates ranging up to 90% of the number of girls/woman in Islamic countries who have their clitoris cut off  "so they will not be slaves to their lust." So what is left? Someone who can now only be a slave to the lust of her husband. (at least until such time as he is tired of her at which point she may be disposed of via an "honor killing.")

Muslim countries have a very low divorce rate!

For an up to date accounting on all of the lovely and wonderfully peaceful things that followers of Islam are doing around the world kindly follow this link. It is an eye opener since the state controlled media in America turns a blind eye on all this stuff..... because it's not *really* news..... not like knowing which Kardashian is having a baby by which boy toy this month is news to them. Now THAT is important stuff to be aware of!

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Here are a couple of thoughts to wrap it up. Your kitchen at home...... kindly tell me how many cockroaches is acceptable to have there while you are cooking meals for your family?

The planet is our collective "kitchen" and Islam=cockroaches. Does that make it easier to understand?

Finally...... If it has to be enforced then it is NOT a religion...... it's tyranny! (or totalitarianism.... your choice..... but certainly not religion)

Just dodged the bullet...... this time.....

   The Senate just handed freedom loving Americans our cowboy hat..... with a bullet hole in it. Bullet got the hat but managed to miss us.... this time. So what the hell am I talking about? A little United Nations scheme with the benign name of UN Resolution 2117. This is a 21 point scheme by the UN to control guns on a world wide basis. Most interesting is agenda point number 11 which: "Calls for the member states to support weapons collections and disarmament of all UN member countries." Let me 'splain that to you. Your 2nd amendment doesn't mean squat to us! Surrender all your firearms..... NOW! Interestingly enough some guns are permitted in their scheme. Care to guess who gets to have them? If you guessed the UN then give yourself a pat on the back and move to the head of the class. 

   The vote to kill the resolution was 53-46 so almost a squeaker. Makes you wonder just what sort of "representatives" we have in Washington if that many would cast a vote against our own Constitution...... doesn't it? WELL!!! Wonder no longer, boys and girls. The old man has a list of all of the Senators who hate the Constitution and believe that you are not capable of being entrusted with firearms with which you can protect yourself, your family, your property and the lives and property of others too. Here are the haters of freedom:

 

Baldwin (D-WI) Baucus (D-MT) Bennett (D-CO) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Coons (D-DE) Cowan (D-MA) Durbin (D-IL) Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Gillibrand (D-NY) Harkin (D-IA) Hirono (D-HI) Johnson (D-SD) Kaine (D-VA) King (I-ME) Klobuchar (D-MN) Landrieu (D-LA) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) McCaskill (D-MO) Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murphy (D-CT) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schatz (D-HI) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Stabenow (D-MI) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Warren (D-MA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR)

   Does anyone besides me see a pattern here? Do the haters of freedom, Constitution and our Bill of Rights seem to belong to any particular political party? OH!! Wait! Except for two, so called, "independents" every single one of the haters of freedom is a Democrat! Yep! I just checked again and not one single "R" in the entire bunch. So the takeaway from this is that your local democrat will sell your ass and your freedom down the river to some "new world order" bunch of tyrants if it helps further their political agenda. How very wonderful for America and Americans, huh? 

   What you see above is a battle plan for the future. To preserve America and return her to her Constitutional roots and put her back on the pathway of freedom for all...... these people from these states MUST be removed from office. These states represent the bastions of leftist ideology. As such ALL leftists in elected office in these states MUST be voted out!

   In everyday terms they are hard core left wing communists and statists who all believe that YOU are far too simple minded to know what is best for you and your family. Without them you'd have no clue how to shop for groceries..... or even exactly what to eat. Hell.... you're probably not even close to being compliant to their government approved eating plan and guidelines. Like your hamburgers a bit on the rare side do you? CRIMINAL! Government doesn't think that's safe and they forbid it! Heck.... you're lucky to even be alive after daring to defy government and eat "undercooked" meat. 

   ((Secret for the government food Nazi's...... I've been known to eat meat RAW with just a bit of salt on it. YUMMY! Still alive and doing okay thank you very much! Once up in Colorado I was in a restaurant with my wife and they had a "steak burger" on the menu. I noticed that entire steaks could be ordered cooked to your liking and reasoned that since the "burger" was made of steak.... ground in their own kitchen..... I should logically be able to order a burger medium rare. WRONG! Nope the Government food Nazi's had this bunch under their thumb and mandated that I could ONLY get the burger I was paying for cooked..... well done. I could go over the entire conversation I tried to have with them but in the end they absolutely refused to cook my food the way I wanted it. "Fine! Kindly sent your bill for lost revenue to the government then because if I'm paying you're cooking it MY way. If you refuse then you just refused me as a customer. And we left.))

   But the statists have a solution for our poor eating decisions too! Obamacare! Yep.... you were too stupid to know anything about health insurance or going to a doctor..... or any of that really hard and complicated stuff. We heard all the promises..... which as the right side of the isle warned us were lies. Turned out that the right was right...... but shady politics got the law passed in the dark of night..... while Queen Nancy proclaimed.... "Well...... we have to pass the bill..... so we can all find out what is IN it!" 

   Just going back to the often overlooked world of sanity and logic..... but isn't it typically better to KNOW what is in any piece of legislation BEFORE you vote on it? Yeah.... I believe it is. So again the democrats voted against individual freedom and liberty and put everyone under their collective thumb so we could be "properly managed and cared for."

   As usual my overly fertile mind has wandered a bit off the reservation. Sometimes when I'm writing or thinking it's like the old time fourth of July when someone would light dime pack of firecrackers. It's impossible to isolate a particular explosion since they all seem to be going off at the same time. Ditto with thoughts forming in my mind. 

   In parting.... and to return and refocus on the initial issue of gun control..... I'll post this REALLY long list as a reminder of exactly who is the REAL threat to society. You may notice that same common thread running throughout this list too............

>> In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.
>>
>> In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.
>>
>> In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
>>
>> In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
>>
>> In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
>>
>> In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
>>
>> In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
>>
>> In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
>>
>> In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
>>
>> In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
>>
>> In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
>>
>> In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
>>
>> In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
>>
>> In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
>>
>> In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
>>
>> In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
>>
>> In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
>>
>> In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.
>>
>> As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
>>
>> Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns. Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.
>> >> SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.…Best idea I've heard to date!
While I am re examining my sources of this data for accuracy there is still one common link that is clear and easily verified by anyone. All the gunmen were democrats and all the shootings were in gun free zones.