Problems on the Right

The problem on the right is threefold. Number one. We are constantly being wrongfully maligned by the fifth column liberal media. The DNC might as well just put the majority of the media under its wing because they are a wholly owned subsidiary of the democrat party

.

Number two. There is NO leadership in the republican party. Right now one of the most junior Senators, Ted Cruz, is demonstrating more leadership THAN the leadership! Without cohesive leadership the people don't get the representation we voted for..... our voices fall on deaf ears.

And Number three. Republicans and democrats have two different visions for America..... one Constitutional and one socialist at best and dictatorial communist at worst. Yet.... when liberals propose legislation to take us farther down their road to destruction all the right does is offer up their version which 1) indicates passive agreement and 2) does nothing to advance what should be THEIR agenda. How about WE advance OUR ideas for a change? What is wrong with looking at liberal legislation and saying: "NO!" That is what opposition parties do! They oppose. The left never misses a chance to say NO to us, do they?

Consider today's headlines. The Republicans have offered multiple funding resolutions keeping 100% of government operational but not providing one cent for ObamaCare. The left from the president all the way down the line as screamed NO! Yet WE caused the shut down? We are to blame? By what twisted logic does that happen?

The president said he won't negotiate. Harry Reid said HE won't negotiate..... yet we're supposed to???? With whom? If we give them 99% of what they want haven't we given enough? In their minds.... no. WE must surrender our principles. Our congressmen must shirk their responsibilities to represent the people who elected them. We must cave to the will of the liberals..... not just this time... but EVERY time. NO!

The majority of republicans in Washington wrongly assume (after their indoctrination briefing) that they are there to forge alliances, be nice, not make waves and pass lots of legislation. WRONG! They are there to REPRESENT US! Heck.... the majority of them are even CALLED representatives and they still can't figure out why they are supposed to be there and what they are supposed to be doing!

There needs to be a movement to repeal the 17th amendment and return the appointment of Senators to the states as the Constitution set forth originally. Our bicameral form of governance was established for very specific reasons. The House was created as the body which represents the population at large. That is where the voice of the people is heard. The Senate was established to represent the rights of the States in legislative matters which affect them. (and the majority do)

For example.... ObamaCare. The MAJORITY of the states are refusing to establish the "Exchanges" that ObamaCare mandates. Why? Because the operational costs were unconstitutionally thrust upon the states without their consent! States don't have a FED..... States can't fire up the presses and create money from thin air like the federal government can. States have to operate within a budget. (Something Obama has either never submitted or failed to submit by the Constitutionally mandated time since assuming office)

Thus one of the first designs of ObamaCare is to bankrupt the states. Question. IF Senators were appointed by the states as their representatives in Congress.... do you honestly think that the law would have seen the light of day? How many states would honestly instruct THEIR REPRESENTATIVE to vote in favor of a piece of legislation that would, by design, bankrupt the state? NONE! Why do we have a 17th amendment? Totally Progressive idea. Sold as giving the people a bigger voice in government. How's that working out? 62% of America was against ObamaCare before it was signed into law. Dang sure doesn't look like our voices are being heard at all, does it?